And then in some places, as the light combines, it combines constructively and other places destructively.

然后在些地方，当光线结合时，它会些东西，而在其他地方则会破坏些东西。

And just like in an opal, light is bent, waves combine constructively or destructively, and different flashes of color appear.

就像蛋白石样，光线弯曲，光波结合时候或破坏些东西，从而出现不同颜色闪光。

The places where the waves interfere destructively become shadows.

波浪破坏性地扰地方 变成了阴影。

And again, whether the light interferes constructively or destructively depends on how the rays line up.

同样，光是建设性涉 还是破坏性涉取决于光线排列方式。

So light waves will interfere either constructively or destructively, depending on the size of this path difference.

因此，光波会建设性或破坏性扰，具体取决于路径差异。

Or more destructively, that they can't go to a normal schoolor hold a normal job or travel on their own.

AL：或者更具破坏性是，他们无法上正常学校或从事正常工作或独自旅行。

But waves interfere DEstructively when one wave's crest run into the other wave's trough, and vice versa.

但是当个波波峰碰到另波波谷时，波会破坏性地扰，反之亦然。

And, if ideas truly are more powerful than force, we should use them constructively and not destructively — in so far as that's possible.

而且，如果思想真比武力更强，我们应该尽可能建设性地使用它们，而不是破坏性地使用它们——可能会达到破坏性程度。

But when the waves are shifted by exactly half a wavelength — or by 1.5 wavelengths, or 2.5, and so on – light rays will interfere DEstructively.

但是，当波移动正好半个波长——或 1。5 个波长，或 2。5 个波长，等等——光线会破坏性地涉。

We're interfering waves together, that's what interferometry means and so if those waves move back and forth a little bit when you interfere them they destructively interfere and you lose your signal.

我们正在起扰波，这就是涉测量法意思，所以如果这些波在你扰它们时来回移动点点，它们就会破坏性地扰，你就会失去信号。

So a Type-1 vulnerability, again, this massive, destructive power, it's a fairly weak assumption to think that in a population of millions of people there would be some that would choose to use it destructively.

所以 1 型漏洞， 这种巨破坏力，认为在数百万人中会有些人会选择破坏性地使用它是个相当薄弱假设。